The web version of this sheet contains links and hints in this font.
(i) Isothermal compression of 1 mole of an ideal gas at 273K from
1 to 2atm pressure. (1atm=1.013Pa.)
See here for a similar example.
(ii) Adiabatic compression of 1 mole of an ideal gas
initially at 273K from 1 to 2atm pressure. (Take
).
Adiabatic compression is covered in this example.
(iii) Isothermal compression of 1 mole of water at 273K from
1 to 2atm pressure. The density of
water is 1000kgm. The bulk modulus of water (at 273K and in
the pressure range indicated) is
Nm. The bulk
modulus is the elastic modulus that relates the volume change to
the pressure change that produces it by
, where is the initial volume.
Remember, water is not an ideal gas! We can't use PV=nRT!
Instead use the information in the question to write the of
in terms of .
(iv) Isothermal magnetization of 1 mole of a paramagnetic sample at
273K from an external field of 1T to an external field of 2T.
Assume that the equation of state is
(v) Isothermal stretching of an elastic string from 0.1m to 0.2m at 273K. The equation of state linking the tension to the length of the string is
where NK and m is the unstretched length.
The work done in stretching a string is given here - but
try to guess it first.
In cases (i), (ii) and (iv), how much heat is absorbed or given out by the
system? You may assume that the internal energy of the paramagnet is .
Here we use the first law, so we can only find the answer
for those cases where we know the internal energy - as we do for an ideal gas
and an ideal paramagnet.
A quantity of ideal gas is taken through the reversible cycle depicted above, where the three processes are isobaric, isochoric and adiabatic respectively. Calculate the work done on the system, and the heat absorbed, during each stage, and check that the total work done by the system is equal to the net heat absorbed--which equals .
Hence show that the efficiency of the system as a heat engine is
The Otto cycle is covered here. Only the isobaric stroke is
new.
This is lower than that of a Carnot engine operating between
the lowest and highest temperatures attained in the cycle ( and respectively).
This is hard to prove algebraically, but using your graphical calculator you should
be able to convince yourself that the function of multiplying is greater than 1
for all positive less than 1 (with ).
It's much easier to prove for the Otto cycle. Try it!