[prev] [up] [top]

A.12 Units in EM

There are several systems of units in electromagnetism. We are familiar with SI units, but Gaussian units are still very common and are used, for instance, in Shankar.

In SI units the force between two currents is used to define the unit of current, and hence the unit of charge. (Currents are much easier to calibrate and manipulate in the lab than charges.) The constant μ0 is defined as 4π × 107  N A2, with the magnitude chosen so that the Ampère is a “sensible” sort of size. Then Coulomb’s law reads

F = q1q2 4πε0 r1 r2 2

and ε0 has to be obtained from experiment. (Or, these days, as the speed of light is now has a defined value, ε0 is obtained from 1(μ0 c2).)

However one could in principle equally decide to use Coulomb’s law to define charge. This is what is done in Gaussian units, where by definition

F = q1q2 r1 r2 2

Then there is no separate unit of charge; charges are measured in N12 m (or the non-SI equivalent): e = 4.803 × 1010 g12 cm32 s1 . (You should never need that!) In these units, μ0 = 4πc2. Electric and magnetic fields are also measured in different units.

The following translation table can be used:

Gauss e E B SI e4πε0 4πε0E 4πμ0B

Note that eE is the same in both systems of units, but eB in SI units is replaced by eBc in Gaussian units. Thus the Bohr magneton μB is e2m in SI units, but e2mc in Gaussian units, and μBB has dimesions of energy in both systems.

The fine-structure constant α is a dimensionless combination of fundamental units, and as such takes on the same value ( 1137) in all systems. In SI it is defined as α = e2(4πε 0c), in Gaussian units as α = e2(c). In all systems, therefore, Coulomb’s law between two particles of charge z1 e and z2 e can be written

F = z1z2cα r1 r2 2

and this is the form I prefer.

[prev] [up] [top]